Other Revelations: Maine and Lefty Catchers
Sunday, July 31st, 2005
When did Maine become a state?
We knew that Maine was originally part of Massachusetts at the inception of the United States, but couldn’t remember when it became a state of its own. I wondered if it became a state as part of a compromise to maintain the balance between free and slave states in the 1800’s, but couldn’t remember my US history notes. It turns out I was on the right track, as Maine (free) and Missouri (slave) were made states as part of the Compromise of 1820.
Why aren’t there any left-handed catchers?
Beaudry asked me if there were any left-handed catchers. I assumed incorrectly that there had to be. I know they are rare, but I figured there had to be one in MLB right now. Nope. The last southpaw behind the plate was in 1989. In fact, only one lefty has caught more than 1000 games (Jack Clements) and that was pre-1900, which was a crazy time for baseball.
The obvious question is why. The “Ask Yahoo!” response argued that a left-handed catcher would have a more difficult time throwing out runners at second base, because right-handed batters (the majority of hitters) would obstruct their motion. Additionally, it’s true that a lefty would have to pivot for a throw to third. Sabernomics estimates these effects are worth about 12 runs a season for equally effective catchers. Of course, the lefty has the advantage making plays at first, either on pick-off plays or bunts/dribblers in front of the plate. I would also argue that at higher levels of baseball, the ratio of left- to right-handed batters increases, tempering the throwing advantage to second base.
My opinion is that left-handed little leaguers are discouraged from playing catcher, partly for the above reasons (whether fairly or not), but also because left-handed catcher’s mitts are not provided to the teams. Little league coaches will use the talented lefties at pitcher, first, or outfield instead. I suppose some left-handed kids could buy their own mitts, but the number is low enough that the odds of one of these to reach the majors is extremely low. However, I don’t feel like there is a systematic reason why a catcher can’t be left handed (unlike a 2B, SS, or 3B).
Odie gave me The Power and the Glory with the bold preface, “It might be my favorite book,” surplanting ![[Click for enlargement] [Click for enlargement]](http://www.realmofthewombat.com/images/cars/_charade_front.jpg)
![[Yosemite Valley from road] [Yosemite Valley from road]](http://www.realmofthewombat.com/images/yosemite-may05/_yosemite_valley_road.jpg)
![[Jer at tunnel overlook] [Jer at tunnel overlook]](http://www.realmofthewombat.com/images/yosemite-may05/_yosemite_tunnel_jer.jpg)
Here’s an album I meant to buy when it came out in 2002, but never got around to it, thus a perfect choice for New Music Friday. I didn’t even realize the Transplants were made up of Tim Armstrong of Rancid and Travis Barker of Blink 182, which is a good thing because I probably would have discarded anything associated with Blink 182. Fortunately, Armstrong and Rob Aston are running the show. Most people are probably familiar with “Diamonds and Guns” from its use in a ![[Sleater-Kinney - The Woods] [Sleater-Kinney - The Woods]](http://www.realmofthewombat.com/images/discos/thewoods.jpg)
It was a tough decision on June 12. Foo Fighters vs. Coldplay. Both had new albums. I opted for the Dave Grohl’s electric/acoustic 2-disc set. Disc 1 of In Your Honor largely picks up where 2002’s One By One left off: powerful guitar and drums and Grohl’s gutteral vocals, well represented by the first single, “Best of You.” The acoustic version of “All My Life” seemed to garner significant attention and perhaps precipitated the 10 track unplugged second disc of In Your Honor. “Cold Day in the Sun” and a couple others are worthy of a listen, but I would rather Foo Fighters hold back the acoustic stuff as a change of pace and focus on the high-voltage rock.